Select Page

AFP Part III: Supplementary Research Articles_Summaries and Analysis

Description: Part III of your Applied Final Project is an extension of Part II.  Using the UMGC library databases, please identify 9 additional empirical, scholarly articles that represent at least 2 other social science disciplines from the article you chose in Part II.  A list of appropriate social science disciplines can be found under the description for Part I. Remember that your articles must represent at least 3 social science disciplines in total.  Your articles should reflect the current research on your topic, so your articles should be not more than 5 years old. For this assignment, at least 6 of your 9 articles should have been published within the past 5 years. Your remaining three articles can include older, seminal works that have been important in guiding current research. You will know that a work is “seminal” or at least noteworthy if most of the recent articles you find refer to it. If you decide to use an article that is older than 5 years, be sure to state why you felt this article was important to include.  Just as you did in Part II, please Give the article name, authors, and source of the article Identify which social science discipline your article represents Summarize the main tenets of the article. Discuss the implications of what the article has to say regarding your research question Please make sure that you choose articles that contrast in some way.  If all of the articles align and say very similar things, you won’t be able to truly draw on the strengths of an interdisciplinary perspective.   Some of the articles you find may discuss your topic using research from a different country.  Feel free to draw on this information. Although you are not required to present a cross-cultural comparison, if you find articles that are relevant, please feel free to incorporate them.  You are not required to write a cohesive paper based on your research articles.  You may list your write-ups in order in a Microsoft Word document, but you do not need to synthesize them.  This synthesis and analysis is key to your final research poster, but does not need to be present in this part of the assignment. Turnitin will be used to evaluate this assignment prior to grading. Please review the syllabus for more information about the use of Turnitin in this course. Due Date Apr 20, 2021 11:59 PM Hide Rubrics Rubric Name: BEHS495 Supplementary Research Articles_Summaries and Analysis (Part III) This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Main tenets Excellent 6.25 points Good 5.5 points Fair 4.75 points Needs Improvement 4 points Missing 0 points Criterion Score Article 1 Summary contains all of the key tenets of the article Summary contains the key tenets of the article with minor omissions Summary contains of the key tenets of the article with several minor or one major omission Summary of the key tenets of the article includes major omissions No summary of major tenets of the article is included Score of Article 1, / 6.25 Article 2 Summary contains all of the key tenets of the article Summary contains the key tenets of the article with minor omissions Summary contains of the key tenets of the article with several minor or one major omission Summary of the key tenets of the article includes major omissions No summary of major tenets of the article is included Score of Article 2, / 6.25 Article 3 Summary contains all of the key tenets of the article Summary contains the key tenets of the article with minor omissions Summary contains of the key tenets of the article with several minor or one major omission Summary of the key tenets of the article includes major omissions No summary of major tenets of the article is included Score of Article 3, / 6.25 Article 4 Summary contains all of the key tenets of the article Summary contains the key tenets of the article with minor omissions Summary contains of the key tenets of the article with several minor or one major omission Summary of the key tenets of the article includes major omissions No summary of major tenets of the article is included Score of Article 4, / 6.25 Article 5 Summary contains all of the key tenets of the article Summary contains the key tenets of the article with minor omissions Summary contains of the key tenets of the article with several minor or one major omission Summary of the key tenets of the article includes major omissions No summary of major tenets of the article is included Score of Article 5, / 6.25 Article 6 Summary contains all of the key tenets of the article Summary contains the key tenets of the article with minor omissions Summary contains of the key tenets of the article with several minor or one major omission Summary of the key tenets of the article includes major omissions No summary of major tenets of the article is included Score of Article 6, / 6.25 Article 7 Summary contains all of the key tenets of the article Summary contains the key tenets of the article with minor omissions Summary contains of the key tenets of the article with several minor or one major omission Summary of the key tenets of the article includes major omissions No summary of major tenets of the article is included Score of Article 7, / 6.25 Article 8 Summary contains all of the key tenets of the article Summary contains the key tenets of the article with minor omissions Summary contains of the key tenets of the article with several minor or one major omission Summary of the key tenets of the article includes major omissions No summary of major tenets of the article is included Score of Article 8, / 6.25 Article 9 Summary contains all of the key tenets of the article Summary contains the key tenets of the article with minor omissions Summary contains of the key tenets of the article with several minor or one major omission Summary of the key tenets of the article includes major omissions No summary of major tenets of the article is included Score of Article 9, / 6.25 This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Implications for research question posed Excellent 3.75 points Good 3.3 points Fair 2.85 points Needs Improvement 2.4 points Missing 0 points Criterion Score Article 1 Discussion of implications for research question posed is comprehensive Discussion of implications for research question posed has 1-2 minor omissions Discussion of implications for research question posed has many minor omissions or one major omission Discussion of implications for research question posed with many major omissions No discussion of implications for research question posed is included Score of Article 1, / 3.75 Article 2 Discussion of implications for research question posed is comprehensive Discussion of implications for research question posed has 1-2 minor omissions Discussion of implications for research question posed has many minor omissions or one major omission Discussion of implications for research question posed with many major omissions No discussion of implications for research question posed is included Score of Article 2, / 3.75 Article 3 Discussion of implications for research question posed is comprehensive Discussion of implications for research question posed has 1-2 minor omissions Discussion of implications for research question posed has many minor omissions or one major omission Discussion of implications for research question posed with many major omissions No discussion of implications for research question posed is included Score of Article 3, / 3.75 Article 4 Discussion of implications for research question posed is comprehensive Discussion of implications for research question posed has 1-2 minor omissions Discussion of implications for research question posed has many minor omissions or one major omission Discussion of implications for research question posed with many major omissions No discussion of implications for research question posed is included Score of Article 4, / 3.75 Article 5 Discussion of implications for research question posed is comprehensive Discussion of implications for research question posed has 1-2 minor omissions Discussion of implications for research question posed has many minor omissions or one major omission Discussion of implications for research question posed with many major omissions No discussion of implications for research question posed is included Score of Article 5, / 3.75 Article 6 Discussion of implications for research question posed is comprehensive Discussion of implications for research question posed has 1-2 minor omissions Discussion of implications for research question posed has many minor omissions or one major omission Discussion of implications for research question posed with many major omissions No discussion of implications for research question posed is included Score of Article 6, / 3.75 Article 7 Discussion of implications for research question posed is comprehensive Discussion of implications for research question posed has 1-2 minor omissions Discussion of implications for research question posed has many minor omissions or one major omission Discussion of implications for research question posed with many major omissions No discussion of implications for research question posed is included Score of Article 7, / 3.75 Article 8 Discussion of implications for research question posed is comprehensive Discussion of implications for research question posed has 1-2 minor omissions Discussion of implications for research question posed has many minor omissions or one major omission Discussion of implications for research question posed with many major omissions No discussion of implications for research question posed is included Score of Article 8, / 3.75 Article 9 Discussion of implications for research question posed is comprehensive Discussion of implications for research question posed has 1-2 minor omissions Discussion of implications for research question posed has many minor omissions or one major omission Discussion of implications for research question posed with many major omissions No discussion of implications for research question posed is included Score of Article 9, / 3.75 This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. APA format Excellent 5 points Good 4.4 points Fair 3.8 points Needs Improvement 3.2 points Missing 0 points Criterion Score APA Citation Style Correct use of APA format (in-text citations, references) Mostly correct use of APA format (in-text citations, references) Several errors in the use of APA format (in-text citations, references)  Many errors in use of APA format (in-text citations, references) No use of APA format Score of APA Citation Style, / 5 This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.  Multidisciplinary sources Excellent 5 points Good 4.4 points Fair 3.8 points Needs Improvement 3.2 points Missing 0 points Criterion Score Use of articles from multiple social science disciplines Correctly identifies articles from at least 3 different social science disciplines across Parts II & III Correctly identifies articles from at least 2 different social science disciplines across Parts II & III Correctly identifies articles from at least 1 different social science discipline across Parts II & III Identifies appropriate articles, but they are not from social science disciplines Does not identify any articles Score of Use of articles from multiple social science disciplines, / 5