Philosophy

This is a forum prompt "2 + 2 = 4." Was this true before there were people (or other beings) around to think it? Explain. Make sure you hit the minimum word counts or you will not receive any points. NOTE: Do not present your position in statements such as "I think" or "I believe." We understand that your statement in an opinion and that there is no way to confirm either the affirmative or negative answer to this question.…

write a letter/email explaining Paley’s teleological argument to someone who does not know anything about it. Then, evaluate the argument by considering its potential for committing one of the fallacies we have seen so far. Just to put you on the right track, the two fallacies you can consider are false analogy and composition. The letter/email can be addressed to anyone. It should not be longer than 350 words. Your letter/email should be in formal register and MLA style. I…

Submit as a single Word document: Part I Define the following ethical perspectives in your own words. A minimum of three sources must be utilized and cited properly with in-text citations and a reference list. Avoid using direct quotes. If you summarize or paraphrase information in your own words, you must cite sources to provide credit for the ideas and concepts. A = Rule utilitarianism B = Kantian ethics C = Virtue ethics D = Care ethics E = Social…

What kind of fallacy of presumption are the following? Explain. These are the Fallacies we worked on. Sweeping Generalization Hasty Generalization Bifurcation Begging the Question Question Begging Epithets Complex Question Special Pleading False Analogy False Cause Slippery Slope Irrelevant Thesis I am going to attach the statements and pdfs on the types of fallacies. Please explain why the statement is that kind of fallacy. Please let me know if i need to answer any questions

Hi, welcome to this week discussion! What is due? Please choose one topic (see below) and post at least one reflection and two comments to your peers' reflections. Why? This assignment is meant to assess your capacity to understand and reflect autonomously on the contents that you studied, and your capacity to engage with different opinions and views in a respectful and fruitful way, collaborating with your peers for an inclusive learning environment. How? Please write: 1) One post on…

Can you help me understand this Philosophy question?INITIAL POST :Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involved).Which of these theories, if any, do you find most reasonable, and why? Provide a clear example to demonstrate your thinking. 2 responses: In responses to at least two peers, check their work. Were their explanations and examples clear and accurate? Identify any problems/errors in their logic or explain why you agree with their rationale. Make sure your…

I’m studying and need help with a Philosophy question to help me learn.For this assignment, complete the following:Identify your organization and write a detailed organizational history, including a mission statement if available. Research background information on your organization.This research should include any and all pertinent research on the organization (both good and bad) including the current status of the organization (is the company growing, expanding, going into bankruptcy, etc.). In addition to researching your organization, you should also do some…

Week 8 Signature Assignment: Final Draft The goal of this paper is to construct a fair-minded, unbiased, analytical analysis of a topic in a comprehensive essay. This is not an opinion piece or a persuasive essay that simply aims to prove or reinforce what you already believe. This would be confirmation bias, and bias must be avoided in this project. This project needs to avoid harsh rhetoric or language that is harmful and hurtful in nature. The point is to…

Use the JUSTICE ARGUMENT OUTLINE as precisely as possible, the argument should be around one page.OUTLINE RULE OF THUMB for step 4: When applying Justice, if possible, state differences, do not state equalities. There are logical problems with equalities (universal instantiation problem): when you say “all should” this could mean none should, better to stress differences if you can.1. Define JUSTICE: Justice demands that we treat equals equally and unequals unequally. (just copy/paste the definition)2. Give a general statement of…

This essay has been written by myself. 1.Evaluate Clarke’s critique of voluntarism (explain the voluntarist position and explain Clarke’s argument before you proceed to evaluate it).2.Is Korsgaard’s Normative Question fundamentally the same as Moore’s Open Question (In his open question argument)? Given the similarities, why do they reach such different conclusions? but just received the feedback from the tutor which some points are quite far away. Revise the problems the first and two documents are comments from the tutor of…